This is a letter from me to Larry Drivon wherein I advise
him of something he probably already knows. That is, as a former
Trust Officer/Lawyer for Wells Fargo Bank in San Francisco
around the time that my trust fund/account and 5% partnership
interest in "Haig Berberian" vis-a-vis Well Fargo
Bank was being established there, and sometime thereafter,
Judge Raymond Daniel Williamson, Jr. had a conflict of interest
and should have recused himself from the case. Larry did not
help me to contest the judgment as I ask in my letter. And
ultimately I did nothing about the matter because I was afraid
to do so. This was the first time that I saw for myself and
thoroughly believed that a conspiracy exists and "the
bad guys" are not just a figment of my overwrought imagination.
And it scared me. The first thing that I did as an in pro per
was to check out the smell that I smelled at the June 20, 1986
hearing. I went to a law library and read the Judge's profile.
And, in my opinion then and now, the Judge should have removed
his honorableness from my case.* He knew that he had worked
for the crooked bank on whose case he was ruling. Either that
or he was a lousy lawyer and didn't know that he was party
to the bank's trust department engaging in fraud. I mean, if
I can figure out that Wells Fargo Bank is and was corrupt,
debased, and defrauding me and therefore probably others as
well, especially in its early days when merging with and/or
acquiring American Trust Co., then the Judge should have known.
On second thought, when adorned with the robe, the slate is
wiped clean. Never mind.
*Of course, the assumption
is that, if not self-chosen, the Judge was not specifically
selected by one or the other if not both sides, to hear this
particular motion. Yes, such things can be manipulated. Exposing
the "justice system" for this type of thing, namely,
fraud and deceit, is one of the purposes of Berberian Mystery
Theatre.