May
3, 1986
This
is a letter from me to Larry Drivon wherein I advise him of
something he probably already knows. That is, as a former Trust
Officer/Lawyer for Wells Fargo Bank in San Francisco around
the time that my trust account and 5% partnership interest
in "Haig Berberian" vis-a-vis
Well Fargo Bank was being established there, and sometime thereafter,
Judge Raymond Daniel Williamson, Jr. had a conflict of interest
and should have recused himself from the case. Larry did not help
me to contest the judgment as I ask in my letter. And ultimately
I did nothing about the matter because I was afraid to do so. This
was the first time that I saw for myself and thoroughly believed
that "the bad guys" are not just a figment of my overwrought
imagination. The first thing that I did as an in pro per was
to check out the smell that I smelled at the June 20, 1986 hearing.
I went to a law library and read the Judge's profile. And, in
my opinion then and now, the Judge should have gotten the hell
off of my case. (Of course, the assumption is that he wasn't
specifically selected for this hearing) He knew that he had worked
for a crooked bank on whose case he was ruling. Either that or
he was a lousy lawyer and didn't know he was party to the bank's
corruption. I mean, if I can figure out that Wells Fargo Bank
is and was sleazy, especially in its early days when merging
with American Trust Co., then the Judge should have known. On
second thought, when the robe is worn, the slate becomes clean.
Okay, never mind.